An Intel request to cancel an order obliging the flea manufacturer to pay $ 2.18
As indicated by Reuters, the US District Judge Alan Albright in Waco, Texas rejected the company’s proposal for a new trial in a recent sealed command.
We have set up a list of the best commercial laptops available
These are the best workstations in the professional market
Need something more portable? Discover the best mobile workstations
Back in March, VLSI received $ 1.5 billion and $ 675 million for two patents that Intel had violated. The first patent, US7725759B2, deals with the speed of management of the clock speed in an electronic device and was originally developed by Sigmatel while the second patent, US7523373B2, which describes a minimum operating voltage technique of The memory has been originally developed by Freescale.
Intention to appeal In a statement by Intel published after Judge Albright, denied his proposal for a new trial, the company said it was disappointed with the decision and that it called it.
However, the flea giant also called for reforms to prevent “litigation investors” using poor quality patents to extract “exorbitant” damages of itself and other large companies, because these. Practices stifling both innovation.
When Intel for the first time sought a new trial in the case, the reasoning of the company that did it was due to the manner in which it believed that the verdict was contaminated by incorrect jury instructions and prison decisions based on Intel colonies earlier. Intel also raised the fact that the verdict was the second largest by a jury in a patent case and that the other three most important verdicts had been overthrown by vacant judgments.
It seems that the ongoing patent lawsuits between Intel and VLSI are not yet completed and that we will probably discover once the flea manufacturer submits his call.
